Latest
Home » Doing Business with Us » Procurement » Supplier Selection and Development » Capability Toolkit Assessment (CAT) 3 Glossary of Scoring Definitions
Contact us

by phone or email

Register for
email alerts

On information that's important to you

Feature

Better information for your journey

The National Traffic Control Centre collects real-time information on road conditions.

Quick Links

The Project Control Framework

On 1st April 2008 we launched the Project Control Framework. The Framework sets out how we, together with the Department for Transport, manage and deliver major improvement projects.

Free Traffic Information Seminars

Helping your business get its customers, drivers and goods where they should be, on time and stress-free.

Capability Assessment Toolkit 3

Introducing new and challenging indicators in the area of corporate social responsibility.

Efficiency Gains from Collaborative Roads Procurement

Delivering efficiency and best value is central

Capability Toolkit Assessment (CAT) 3 Glossary of Scoring Definitions

The terms used in applying the CAT3 scoring process are defined below:

"User"

Any individual or group of individuals affected by, or involved in, what we do in relation to a particular indicator. The specific people who should be considered as "users" will vary from indicator to indicator.

"Early Days/Limited" (Score 1-3)

  • Minimum legal requirement
  • New initiatives
  • Approaches superseded but not decommissioned

"Operationally Effective" (Score 4-6)

  • Relevant to day to day activities
  • Supports business strategy
  • Consistent with key drivers
  • Likely to be sponsored / monitored at management level
  • Complies with all relevant standards.

"Strategically Valuable" (Score 7-9)

  • Key to "nth year vision"
  • Drives business strategy and direction
  • Likely to have board-level sponsorship/monitoring
  • Likely to be fundamental to company's self image
  • Measures clearly demonstrate value to the business

"External Differentiator" (Score 10-12)

  • Unique and/or "pioneering" approach with clear strategic benefit
  • Likely to be recognised by others within and outside the industry
  • Extensively publicised/used to attract customers/employees/partners/investment etc.
  • "Hits you in the face" – "Wow factor"

"Fits with other things we do"

General guidance:

  • If the approach(es) follows and reflects other things that are
    done, score should be 1 – 2.
  • If the approach(es) drives other things that are done, score
    should be 3-4.

"Not at all"

Not an absolute term – includes "very little".

"Fully"

Not an absolute term – includes "practically complete", "no perceptible gaps or shortcomings".

"Reviewed and improved"

The level and extent of review and improvement will determine
score:

  • If review and improvement is carried out in the operational
    environment, the score is likely to be 1-2
  • If this happens at a strategic level, score is likely to be 3-4.

"Embedded into the culture"

Includes behavioural and maturity elements:

  • How far into the collective mindset and behaviour patterns does the approach go?
  • How long has it been in place?

"Sets us apart from everyone else"

  • Consider both sector comparisons and broader ones.
  • For a score of 4, comparisons should definitely be "world class".

"Deployed to its full potential"

  • Stretching deployment beyond the obvious to exploit this capability to the fullest.
  • Consider all potential dimensions, including scope within and outside the organisation, engaging partners and suppliers, time.