Latest
Home » Knowledge Centre » Respecting the Environment » Prioritisation of Resurfacing of Concrete Trunk Roads with Quieter Materials » Prioritisation of Resurfacing of Concrete Trunk Roads with Quieter Materials
Contact us

by phone or email

Register for
email alerts

On information that's important to you

Feature

Disabled Driver Questionnaire

We want to produce a driver information programme for our disabled customers. To help us produce the best possible guidance, please take a few minutes to fill in our questionnaire.

Feature

Better information for your journey

The National Traffic Control Centre collects real-time information on road conditions

Quick Links

Lane Hog!

John Stapleton looks into why people Lane Hog and what effects it has on the driver hogging the lane and other road users.

Educating tomorrow's drivers

See how we are driving through key messages about safety on our network for the drivers of tomorrow.

Meet the Ancestors

Find out about the history of roads and the work the Agency does to preserve archaeological remains.

See when traffic will be lightest

Our traffic forecaster can help get you there quicker

Prioritisation of Resurfacing of Concrete Trunk Roads with Quieter Materials

2. Consultation with English local highway authorities and others

The proposed criteria were derived to conform with the Agency's business plan objectives of minimising the whole life cost and disruption to the network and reducing traffic noise to benefit some three million people living within 600m of trunk roads. The proposed criteria were:

  • dealing with the noisiest sites that affect the most people; this meant that we would endeavour to improve the situation for the maximum number of people who are closest to trunk roads in the earlier part of the programme;
  • minimising disruption to general public and users of the network; this meant that we would try to combine this work with other planned works on the network and use construction, procurement and traffic management methods that speed up the works;
  • minimising whole life cost, i.e. providing the right treatment at the right time with minimum disruption, and achieving value for money; we have a duty to protect the taxpayers' interest and wherever possible will try to programme works to fit in with maintenance needs.

The Agency wrote to and sought the views of:

  1. All County Councils in England
  2. All District Councils in England
  3. London Boroughs affected by trunk roads
  4. Transport for London
  5. All Unitary Councils in England
  6. All City Councils in England
  7. All Metropolitan Councils in England
  8. All Borough Councils in England
  9. Local Government Association
  10. Design, Build, Finance and Operate (DBFO) Companies

It also published the consultation letter on its website and the Government's central register of consultations hosted on www.ukonline.gov.uk

2.1 Summary of Responses to Consultation

2.1.1 Facts and Figures

The Agency issued its consultation letter on 29 December 2000 requesting comments by 23 March 2001. It was sent to 417 English local authorities and 12 other organisations; 92 of whom responded which was a reasonable level of return considering that not all local authorities are affected by concrete trunk roads.

Table below shows the level of response received from those who were issued with the consultation letter:

Local Authority No of Letters Sent by HA Number of Letters Received Number of E-mails Received Total No of Responses
City Councils 35 6 0 6
Borough Council 130 16 3 19
Metropolitan Borough Council 26 3 2 5
District Council 136 31 4 35
County Council 35 20 1 21
London Borough 7 1 1 2
Local Government Association 1 1 0 1
Parish Council* 1 1 0 1
Transport for London 1 0 0 0
Unitary Authority 46 1 0 1
DBFO Company 11 1 0 1
TOTAL 429 81 11 92

* The consultation letter was not sent to Parish Councils as they are not Highway Authorities. However, some received copies of the letter through their Highway Authority and one Parish Council contacted the Agency for a copy of the consultation letter.

445 letters and e-mails were received from individuals, MPs, campaign groups and other organizations shown below:

Group Number of LettersReceived No of E-mails Received Total Number of Responses
Residents Association 1 0 1
Individual 73 11 84
Campaign Group 340 * 0 340
Chartered Surveyors 1 0 1
Member of Parliament 12 0 12
Council for the Protection of Rural England (East Devon Group) 1 0 1
Parish Councils * 10 0 10
Council for National Parks 1 0 1
Automobile Association 1 0 1
TOTAL 440 11 451

* 220 identical letters were received from different individuals campaigning for the resurfacing of A180. Their response has been considered as part of a campaign group instead of individuals.

* Since the beginning of July, 117 identical letters have been received from people living close to A50 Doveridge seeking priority for their road. Their response has been counted as part of a campaign group instead of individuals.