Better information for your journey
The National Traffic Control Centre collects real-time information on road conditions.
The Project Control Framework
On 1st April 2008 we launched the Project Control Framework. The Framework sets out how we, together with the Department for Transport, manage and deliver major improvement projects.
Traffic news on your desktop
Helpful ways to access the latest traffic information when you need it.
Public Consultation November 2003
A66 Temple Sowerby to Appleby
Environmental Effects
The Agency attaches great importance to environmental issues. All six proposed schemes will be designed as sensitively as possible. For example, planting of native trees and shrubs would be used to help integrate the road into the surrounding landscape. Steps will also be taken to safeguard water quality, ecology and cultural heritage.
A full Environmental Impact Assessment has been carried out and the results are summarised on the following table.
| Environmental Issue | Option Causing The Least Environmental Impact | General effect of ticked option | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option 2A | Option 2F | Option 2K | Notes regarding differences in impacts between the routes | |||
| Air Quality | Closely followed by Option 2K. | Positive | Air quality will improve for local communities. | |||
| Cultural Heritage | N/A | Negative | Further archaeological survey work will be carried out. | |||
| Disruption Due To Construction | 2A and 2F impact A66, 2K the County road network. | Negative | Every effort will be made to minimise disruption during construction. | |||
| Ecology and Nature Conservation | 2A is significantly worse. | Negative | The routes are through mainly agricultural grassland of low conservation value. Each route had impacts on a number of protected species. | |||
| Landscape Effects: Character | 2K is least favoured. 2A & 2F similar. | Negative | Effects will be mitigated by landscaping and planting. | |||
| Landscape Effects: Visual Impact | 2F and 2K similar. | Negative | Effects will be mitigated by landscaping and planting. | |||
| Land Use: Demolition | Demolition of farm buildings on 2A & 2F. | Negative | N/A | |||
| Land Use: Community Land | No community land affected. | Neutral | Not affected. | |||
| Land Use: Development Land | Closely followed by 2F. 2K has significantly more adverse impacts. | Negative | Impacts both positive and negative generally cancel each other out. | |||
| Land Use: Agricultural Land | 2K significantly more adverse. | Negative | Agricultural land is the only land directly affected by the proposals. | |||
| Traffic Noise and Vibration | Little difference between options. | Positive | Noise levels affecting property generated by traffic generally decrease for all proposals. | |||
| Pedestrians, Cyclists etc. | Little difference between options. | Positive | Opportunity to provide a safer longitudinal route along the original A66 for non motorised use. | |||
| Vehicle Travellers: Driver View | 2K is favoured. | Negative | Landscaping and planting will restrict views. | |||
| Vehicle Travellers: Driver Stress | N/A | Positive | Improved alignment and signing, fewer junctions improving safety. | |||
| Water Quality and Drainage | Differences are relatively small. | Negative | New structure required across Trout Beck. | |||
| Geology and Soils | 2A and 2F equally favoured. | Neutral | Mine workings to the north of Kirkby Thore. | |||
| Policies and Plans | No option is favoured. | Neutral | Proposals generally in accordance with relevant policies and plans. | |||
Reasons for Rejecting Route 2I
View larger image- Major impact on the Roman Camp Scheduled Ancient Monument
- Affects a number of properties currently alongside existing A66
- Conflict with the existing landslip at Crackenthorpe
- Vehicles leaving Crackenthorpe heading west, would have to access the A66 via a link to the new junction at C3063
What Happens Next
Your views, together with those of the Local Authorities and other bodies will be carefully considered by the Secretary of State for Transport. A decision will then be announced on whether the proposals are to be taken forward. If they are, then a route would then be protected for planning purposes and developed in greater detail.
By commenting now, you will not prejudice your right to comment for or against any future detailed proposals subsequently published under the Highways Act.
We look forward to seeing you at the exhibition.
Further Information
There are five other sections of the A66 at Public Consultation:
- Penrith to Temple Sowerby
- Temple Sowerby to Appleby
- Bowes Bypass
- Cross Lanes to Greta Bridge
- Stephen Bank to Carkin Moor
Copies of all six public consultation leaflets are available on the Highways Agency website. If you have any questions on this or any of the above schemes please ask at the exhibition or write to:
Highways Agency
Major Projects Team M1
Room 710, Sunley Tower
Piccadilly Plaza
Manchester, M1 4BE.
For the attention of Marilyn Sinfield or telephone 08457 50 40 30



