Latest
Home » Road Projects » Area 13 » A66 Temple Sowerby to Appleby » Public Consultation November 2003 » Public Consultation November 2003
Contact us

by phone or email

Register for
email alerts

On information that's important to you

Feature

Better information for your journey

The National Traffic Control Centre collects real-time information on road conditions.

Quick Links

The Project Control Framework

On 1st April 2008 we launched the Project Control Framework. The Framework sets out how we, together with the Department for Transport, manage and deliver major improvement projects.

Traffic news on your desktop

Helpful ways to access the latest traffic information when you need it.

Public Consultation November 2003

A66 Temple Sowerby to Appleby

Environmental Effects

The Agency attaches great importance to environmental issues. All six proposed schemes will be designed as sensitively as possible. For example, planting of native trees and shrubs would be used to help integrate the road into the surrounding landscape. Steps will also be taken to safeguard water quality, ecology and cultural heritage.

A full Environmental Impact Assessment has been carried out and the results are summarised on the following table.

Environmental Issue Option Causing The Least Environmental Impact General effect of ticked option Comment
Option 2A Option 2F Option 2K Notes regarding differences in impacts between the routes
Air Quality tick cross cross Closely followed by Option 2K. Positive Air quality will improve for local communities.
Cultural Heritage cross cross tick N/A Negative Further archaeological survey work will be carried out.
Disruption Due To Construction cross cross tick 2A and 2F impact A66, 2K the County road network. Negative Every effort will be made to minimise disruption during construction.
Ecology and Nature Conservation cross cross tick 2A is significantly worse. Negative The routes are through mainly agricultural grassland of low conservation value. Each route had impacts on a number of protected species.
Landscape Effects: Character tick tick cross 2K is least favoured. 2A & 2F similar. Negative Effects will be mitigated by landscaping and planting.
Landscape Effects: Visual Impact tick cross cross 2F and 2K similar. Negative Effects will be mitigated by landscaping and planting.
Land Use: Demolition cross cross tickDemolition of farm buildings on 2A & 2F. Demolition of farm buildings on 2A & 2F. Negative N/A
Land Use: Community Land cross cross cross No community land affected. Neutral Not affected.
Land Use: Development Land tick cross cross Closely followed by 2F. 2K has significantly more adverse impacts. Negative Impacts both positive and negative generally cancel each other out.
Land Use: Agricultural Land tick tick cross 2K significantly more adverse. Negative Agricultural land is the only land directly affected by the proposals.
Traffic Noise and Vibration tick cross cross Little difference between options. Positive Noise levels affecting property generated by traffic generally decrease for all proposals.
Pedestrians, Cyclists etc. tick cross cross Little difference between options. Positive Opportunity to provide a safer longitudinal route along the original A66 for non motorised use.
Vehicle Travellers: Driver View tick cross cross 2K is favoured. Negative Landscaping and planting will restrict views.
Vehicle Travellers: Driver Stress tick cross cross N/A Positive Improved alignment and signing, fewer junctions improving safety.
Water Quality and Drainage cross cross tick Differences are relatively small. Negative New structure required across Trout Beck.
Geology and Soils tick tick cross 2A and 2F equally favoured. Neutral Mine workings to the north of Kirkby Thore.
Policies and Plans tick tick tick No option is favoured. Neutral Proposals generally in accordance with relevant policies and plans.

Reasons for Rejecting Route 2I

View larger image  
  • Major impact on the Roman Camp Scheduled Ancient Monument
  • Affects a number of properties currently alongside existing A66
  • Conflict with the existing landslip at Crackenthorpe
  • Vehicles leaving Crackenthorpe heading west, would have to access the A66 via a link to the new junction at C3063

What Happens Next

Your views, together with those of the Local Authorities and other bodies will be carefully considered by the Secretary of State for Transport. A decision will then be announced on whether the proposals are to be taken forward. If they are, then a route would then be protected for planning purposes and developed in greater detail.

By commenting now, you will not prejudice your right to comment for or against any future detailed proposals subsequently published under the Highways Act.

We look forward to seeing you at the exhibition.

Further Information

There are five other sections of the A66 at Public Consultation:

  • Penrith to Temple Sowerby
  • Temple Sowerby to Appleby
  • Bowes Bypass
  • Cross Lanes to Greta Bridge
  • Stephen Bank to Carkin Moor

Copies of all six public consultation leaflets are available on the Highways Agency website. If you have any questions on this or any of the above schemes please ask at the exhibition or write to:

Highways Agency
Major Projects Team M1
Room 710, Sunley Tower
Piccadilly Plaza
Manchester, M1 4BE.

For the attention of Marilyn Sinfield or telephone 08457 50 40 30